Cyndy's rebuttal to Andy
I didn't bite when Andy Dickinson posted his rather cheeky "video strategy" videos. They're well produced (Andy has a great narration voice) and funny in their way, but also (especially on the point-and-shoot side) spoiled by a few red herrings.
I just found that Cyndy Green (who we hired a while back to do video training in Canton, Ohio) produced a red-herring-free rebuttal.
[youtube 2eXY9WARbpc nolink]
I applaud Andy for his creativity in tackling the "make it great" vs. "just do it" debate, but Cyndy's rebuttal is spot on. Be sure to listen for the tag line.
Comments
Andy:
I commented that I thought Cyndy's rebuttal was a fairer view (and more my take on things). It's about the way a strategy thought out and put in to practice rather than the stereotyped extremes.
I think 'make it great' and 'just do it' is a bit different from the point and shoot and quality I poked fun at. One is motivation the other implementing strategy. Perhaps, more basically, 'make it great' and 'just do it' is where we should be debating rather than the p&s and quality debate.
The videos were meant to represent that extreme 'red herring' filled debate that still permeates rather than bait anyone. Least of all you. I hope they where both equally 'stupid' in there own way- they where constructed out of all the uninformed debate (both for and against|) that is out there.
Perhaps not the most constructive way to parody the whole debate but it was a long week :)
BTW. That is my best impression of a posh English accent. My own voice is considerably more northern and less posh then that. Just be thankful I didn't try my American accent.
Howard Owens:
Sorry I missed your comment on Cyndy's post, Andy.
cyndy green:
Andy...
I viewed and reviewed and thought your videos were well-thought-out. Exposed the worst of both arguments. You, by the way, have a much better voice then I ever will with my bastardized Aussie/Yank attempt at proper English.
And this really is about the survival of journalism AND jobs.